A4S

 找回密码
 进入圣域
查看: 1511|回复: 5

[讨论] [背景介绍]Asmita

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-3-7 13:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Asmita

www.mysticism.nl


An important concept in Indian philosophy is asmita, a term which is difficult to translate but which can be described as the identification of a subject with his limiting adjuncts. This needs a clarification. In Indian philosophy the true nature of man consists of a divine kernel, which is in itself pure and infinite. This true nature is called Atman, the world-soul, which all living beings share and which is the source of life (cf. the Latin word anima). For the enlightened tthinker this Atman, his own true soul, is none other than Brahman itself, the creative force of the universe. By this definition man has a kernel which is non-ego and which is immortal.

Unfortunately man is fallen from this initial phase of grace by the forces of Maya, the sensory world that drags man away from his true divine nature by all kinds of deceptions and illusions. Man has become ignorant of his divine status and of his primal perfection. In this ignorance man has lost its anchor and his foundation, which alone can make him happy and perfect again. He roams about in complete stupification and bewilderment. He is like a sheep which has lost his loving and tender shepherd. He clings to everything he can get hold of to get his security back. He even lets himself in with the wolf who says he can bring him back again to the stable.

In this state of erring and bewilderment man is not complete in itself but is looking for an identity. Instead of thinking ''I'm Brahman'' (which is the only truth ever to be known) he starts Giotto: the apparation to Gregory IXidentifying himself with everything he contacts with. The first thing the soul encounters in his own consciousness is his own thinking, because this is the first thing to shine forth in his consciousness. This faculty of thinking is a product of Prana, the animal principle of life, which materializes into our organic functions of breath, blood circulation, our metabolic functions etc. Prana is ultimately controlled by Brahman itself, but a soul in ignorance will not see this point. He thinks that his true nature consists of thinking, because he does not phantom another reality besides his own ego-consciousness. If the number 1 falls out in a row the number 2 comes the first in line.

A man without knowledge of his true nature can do nothing besides identifying himself with his own thoughts. So he says to himself: "I'm an anxious person, I'm an angry person, I'm an intelligent person etc.''

In all these instances the individual divine soul starts identifying itself with his own limiting adjuncts. So you'll often see people, who are beguiled by asmita , pretending to be something which in fact they are not (and that's why they look so ridiculous). One person says to himself: ''Look, I'm a professor!'' While another lets the world know he's a sales-representative. Again another thinks himself to be a student or a teacher. But this is, again, a misinterpretation caused by ignorance. A truly religious (ie. tied back to his source), intelligent person can only say that he is Brahman: "I'm the unspeakable, unlimited source of the universe. In me there is the whole world. Everything is knowable to me, because I carry everything in me. I'm a part of everyone and everyone is a part of me. We all share the same nature which starts us living and to which we reside when our animal functions subside.''

Asmita is a fault of limitation, a fault of a narrow view of life. Thoughts are no more than bubbles. They come and they go. They are not substantial. The only substance in the world is the God/Brahman.
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-7 13:21 | 显示全部楼层
[Atman ] 梵天(印度神话最高主宰)

Asmita简而言之就是通过参悟达到天人对话,进而天人合一的境界。

在梵文中有两个字:ahankar 和 asmita.。Ahankar是“我是”的意思,asmita意味着“是”。就只是“是”-自我已经不存在了,只是它的影子还在。你总是还感觉到你自己。这不是一个想法,如果这是“我是”的概念,那么它就是自我。在深度的入定中,自我早已完全的消失不见;但是有一个影子般的amness“我是”还在,只是个感觉徘徊在你的周围而已。在入定的静心冥想中,就像是处于清晨一般,太阳还未升起,雾蒙蒙的:asmita-“是”仍然还在。 你仍然随时可能退回去。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2007-3-7 13:34 | 显示全部楼层
LZ干嘛自己连楼啊,而且这帖子MS有人发过类似的了!! [s:31]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-7 13:39 | 显示全部楼层
因为第一楼是外文原文。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2007-3-7 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
楼主,为什么你在1楼的“翻译”,和顶楼的英文内容完全不一样?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-7 17:46 | 显示全部楼层
引用第4楼shathena2007-03-07 14:03发表的“”:
楼主,为什么你在1楼的“翻译”,和顶楼的英文内容完全不一样?

谁说我翻译了…… 汗…… 那篇文章是个荷兰人的见解

1楼的东西是我另摘的,比较东方的观点。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 进入圣域

本版积分规则

广告合作|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|A4S ( 苏ICP备12080535 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-24 09:06 , Processed in 0.078125 second(s), 8 queries , File On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表