社区新空间的测试（二个测试空间），希望大家踊跃参与！

囲碁ヒカル · 发表于 2006-1-6 12:49

<

>执行时间：15.62500毫秒。查询数据库0次。
<

>新的那个

fans · 发表于 2006-1-6 13:14

怎么都进不去啊？

爱尔贝蕾斯 · 发表于 2006-1-6 16:08

<

>执行时间：46.87500毫秒。查询数据库6次。<

>网通的继续路过。。。。。。

sakam · 发表于 2006-1-6 23:59

<

>空間二試了好幾次都進不去.

xgg · 发表于 2006-1-7 11:16

上海电信ADSL

两个对我都很正常

第一个速度比第二个慢

andrewren · 发表于 2006-1-7 12:41

<

>

inging zhx.w91.west263.cn [61.139.126.13] with 32 bytes of data:<

>Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=52<

>

ing statistics for 61.139.126.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 152ms, Maximum = 279ms, Average = 226ms<

>//---------------------------------------------------------------------<

>

inging zhx.a32.zgsj.com [221.231.138.32] with 32 bytes of data:<

>Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=115<

>Ping statistics for 221.231.138.32:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 175ms, Maximum = 259ms, Average = 205ms//---------------------------------------------------------------------Pinging <a href=\"http://www.all4seiya.com\" target=\"_blank\" >www.all4seiya.com</A> [61.129.102.63] with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=116Ping statistics for 61.129.102.63:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 202ms, Average = 175ms对我来讲, 目前这个是最快的...

andrewren · 发表于 2006-1-7 12:41

<

>

inging zhx.w91.west263.cn [61.139.126.13] with 32 bytes of data:<

>Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=52<

>

ing statistics for 61.139.126.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 152ms, Maximum = 279ms, Average = 226ms<

>//---------------------------------------------------------------------<

>

inging zhx.a32.zgsj.com [221.231.138.32] with 32 bytes of data:<

>Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=115<

>Ping statistics for 221.231.138.32:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 175ms, Maximum = 259ms, Average = 205ms//---------------------------------------------------------------------Pinging <a href=\"http://www.all4seiya.com\" target=\"_blank\" >www.all4seiya.com</A> [61.129.102.63] with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=116Ping statistics for 61.129.102.63:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 202ms, Average = 175ms对我来讲, 目前这个是最快的...

andrewren · 发表于 2006-1-7 12:42

<

>

inging zhx.w91.west263.cn [61.139.126.13] with 32 bytes of data:<

>Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=52<

>

ing statistics for 61.139.126.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 152ms, Maximum = 279ms, Average = 226ms<

>//---------------------------------------------------------------------<

>

inging zhx.a32.zgsj.com [221.231.138.32] with 32 bytes of data:<

>Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=115<

>Ping statistics for 221.231.138.32:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 175ms, Maximum = 259ms, Average = 205ms//---------------------------------------------------------------------Pinging <a href=\"http://www.all4seiya.com\" target=\"_blank\" >www.all4seiya.com</A> [61.129.102.63] with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=116Ping statistics for 61.129.102.63:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 202ms, Average = 175ms对我来讲, 目前这个是最快的...

andrewren · 发表于 2006-1-7 12:43

<

>

inging zhx.w91.west263.cn [61.139.126.13] with 32 bytes of data:<

>Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.139.126.13: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=52<

>

ing statistics for 61.139.126.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 152ms, Maximum = 279ms, Average = 226ms<

>//---------------------------------------------------------------------<

>

inging zhx.a32.zgsj.com [221.231.138.32] with 32 bytes of data:<

>Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=115
Reply from 221.231.138.32: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=115<

>Ping statistics for 221.231.138.32:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 175ms, Maximum = 259ms, Average = 205ms//---------------------------------------------------------------------Pinging <a href=\"http://www.all4seiya.com/\" target=\"_blank\" >www.all4seiya.com</A> [61.129.102.63] with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=116
Reply from 61.129.102.63: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=116Ping statistics for 61.129.102.63:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 202ms, Average = 175ms对我来讲, 目前这个是最快的...

Mimosa · 发表于 2006-1-7 20:08

<

>两个都还可以，但是貌似第一个快一些～～<

>

S：喜欢挂在那里那个卡妙，呵呵～～

风之影 · 发表于 2006-1-7 20:32

<

>这样的测试我觉得没什么意义......每次连接都只是一两个人在线....根本测试不出效果..把all4seiya玉米绑过去..高在线才能试出效果.........<

>这个好象是 access版本的dvbbs吧.....建议更换sql 版的在做测试...access数据库人数到一定数量速度就会大大减慢...即使你空间在好.有足够的带宽也没用.根本测试不出效果..事实上平均在线有500人以上的站点没什么人使用access版本程序地...

风之影 · 发表于 2006-1-7 20:32

<

>这样的测试我觉得没什么意义......每次连接都只是一两个人在线....根本测试不出效果..把all4seiya玉米绑过去..高在线才能试出效果.........<

>这个好象是 access版本的dvbbs吧.....建议更换sql 版的在做测试...access数据库人数到一定数量速度就会大大减慢...即使你空间在好.有足够的带宽也没用.根本测试不出效果..事实上平均在线有500人以上的站点没什么人使用access版本程序地...

风之影 · 发表于 2006-1-7 20:36

<

>这样的测试我觉得没什么意义......每次连接都只是一两个人在线....根本测试不出效果..把all4seiya玉米绑过去..高在线才能试出效果.........<

>这个好象是 access版本的dvbbs吧.....建议更换sql 版的在做测试...access数据库人数到一定数量速度就会大大减慢...即使你空间在好.有足够的带宽也没用.根本测试不出效果..事实上平均在线有500人以上的站点没什么人使用access版本程序地......<

>希望使用php+sql的程序组合..或者jsp程序...比之asp论坛安全程度和速度都要快很多地.....不过牺牲就素......................飘................

风之影 · 发表于 2006-1-7 20:42

<

>,网站1.
<

>执行时间：15.62500毫秒。查询数据库0次。
<

>网站2
<

>页面执行时间 0.06250 秒, 4 次数据查询
<

>公司电信宽带...

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-7 23:38:50编辑过]

风之影 · 发表于 2006-1-7 20:51

<

>我觉得这样的测试没什么实际意义......每次连接都只是一两个人在线....根本测试不出效果..把all4seiya玉米绑过去..高在线才能试出效果.........<

>这个好象是 access版本的dvbbs吧.....建议更换sql 版的在做测试...access数据库同时在线人数到一定数量,速度就会大大减慢...即使你空间在好.有足够的带宽也没用.根本测试不出效果..事实上平均在线有500人以上的站点很少有人使用access版本程序地......<

>希望使用php+sql的程序组合..或者jsp程序...比之asp论坛安全程度和速度都要快很多地.....不过牺牲就素......................飘................

skygong · 发表于 2006-1-7 22:05

<

>沈阳网通ADSL 1M<

>第一个：打开网页非常的慢。31.25000毫秒。查询数据库2次。我算了一下，打开用了3分钟。<

>第二个：跟本打不开。

skygong · 发表于 2006-1-7 22:07

<

>沈阳网通ADSL 1M <

>第一个：31.25000毫秒。查询数据库2次。打开网页非常慢，算了一下，用了3分多钟。<

>第二个：跟本打不开。

七之彩 · 发表于 2006-1-10 03:54

<

>如果能约好20-30人在同一时间一起登陆就好了。再一起做些发贴、删贴的操作。<

>这样单个人跑过去看，恐怕不能看出问题来。<

>要不要约个大家都在的时间一起跑上去测试啊？

bitwoods · 发表于 2006-1-7 23:09

去试试

kimhwanhee · 发表于 2006-1-8 18:11

<

>第一个速度慢,第二个为正在建设中ING.

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			进入圣域